Is Credit Repair Moral
Legal
vs. Moral vs. Fair - I'm not going to try to convince anyone of the inherent
fairness of these tactics, because I'll tell you right up front: These
tactics just aren't fair, and here's why.
Most consumers aren't educated to how credit scores are derived, and the
purveyor of the secret FICO formulae, the mysterious Fair, Isaac & Company
(NYSE: FIC), likes it that way. So, by definition, the mere act of
reading this seminar puts you in a horribly unfair advantage with respect to
the hordes that are terribly blind.
Even worse, those FICO scores radically -- or should I say, RADICALLY, in all
caps -- impact how much ones pays for home mortgages, car loans, credit card
interest, and even insurance premiums, among other things. Some potential
employers, in fact, routinely pull credit reports in an effort to better judge
the character of their applicants. What's worse is that not everyone
agrees -- and certainly not all psychologists, a group I can dare to represent
-- that a FICO score provides a valid measure of one's personal
character. The reason: horrible stuff can happen to otherwise moral
people, all of which can completely trash a heretofore decades-old pristine
payment history -- accidents, uncooperative health insurance adjusters, sudden
unemployment, expensive litigation, divorce with unsatisfactory terms, personal
tragedies of all kinds, etc.
Consider this: Credit scores, and the credit reports which underlie them,
have become a kind of "Human Worth Quotient"
rather than simply a flexible credit score. For example, a potential
employer disqualified a divorced woman, on the basis of her credit score, even
though her runaway husband left her with huge debts beyond her means. Is
this moral? It may not be moral, but it's legal. And it will be
legal for the full seven years it takes for those correct but negative tradelines to naturally age off of her report. Oops,
I should say, "age off of her reports" -- because if she wants to
confront this, she'll need to wrangle with three (not just one)
sometimes-uncooperative private companies who compile and sell those reports
about her. Again, is this fair or moral? Perhaps not,
depending upon your personal point of view, but one thing's certain: It's
definitely legal.
Those of you who are reading this seminar certainly have an unfair
advantage. Likewise, those of you who want to play hardball -- with the
ultimate goal of three clean credit bureau reports, irrespective of what's
there now -- will likewise enjoy an unfair advantage when armed with the
guerilla tactics described here. But, you'll be legal. Some of
these techniques are delineated by Federal statute, in fact, and I'll say so
when that's the case. Here are some things you can do to help repair credit.
So it comes down to this: If you knew you could raise your FICO scores by
200 points and do it by breaking no laws, would you do so if you knew you
weren't being fair to other consumers? I can't answer that for you.
I will say that these private companies -- i.e., the credit reporting agencies,
some of the companies which use the resultant credit scores, as well as certain
abusive collection agencies -- are treating consumers unfairly every single day
and don't seem to worry much about it at all. Is that true of all
companies and in all cases? Of course not.
Credit scoring allows colorblind loan qualifications (which
is, I would contend, far superior to the pre-1971 system where white men
-- almost exclusively -- made lending decisions in accordance with their
subjective whims.) My contention, however, is that the present system, in
which these incredibly critical scoring formulas are kept secret and
facilitated by three accident-prone privately-held credit reporting companies,
is inherently unfair, inconvenient, and often immoral. They're all legal,
though.
Visitors who read this page also viewed these pages:
...